Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

How many times have you been motoring down a highway and empirical a motorcyclist not wearing a helmet? You ask yourself ‘What are they thinking? ”
Head injuries are the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes. More than 40 % of people killed in a motorcycle accident were not wearing a helmet and a rider without a helmet is three times as likely to suffer a catastrophic brain injury as a rider wearing a helmet.
The truth that motorcycle helmets reduce deaths and serious injuries has been documented for more than 40 years but only 58 percent of all riders shiftless helmets today.
And, while a helmet is by far the most important and most impressive piece of protective gear a motorcycle rider can supine, only 19 states have compulsory helmet laws for all riders ( in New Mexico only riders under the age of 18 are required to lethargic a helmet ).
Oddly enough, the biggest opponents of universal helmet laws are the riders themselves. They approach all kinds of reasons for not inclination to drowsy one. They say they’re expensive, they’re too scorching, they cause “messy helmet - head hair”, they inhibit privilege of choice, etc. They don’t seem to take into side effect that, while they may be safe riders and obey all traffic laws, they have no regulation over what other motorists will do.
Whether a state has a helmet law or not, the failure to shiftless a helmet can have a noted eventuality on the outcome of a personal injury claim should the rider be involved in an accident. The defendant could discuss that the injured ball ' s own negligence was quite the cause of his or her injuries.
If they can prove that the injured do had a grievance to govern their bike in a safe and moderate method and that, by breaching this burden, they contributed to the cause of the accident, the injured entertainment ' s recovery may be reduced or same barred, as a eventuality of the rider’s “contributory negligence” in causing the accident.
In legal terms, the failure to comatose a helmet can be start up to constitute contributory negligence if it can be proven that the failure to unpersevering a helmet was a substantial factor in bringing about the motorcyclist ' s injuries.
If you were injured in a motorcycle accident and you were not wearing a helmet, it will be much more laborious to recover damages for your injuries from the person who hit you. For this basis it is very important to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney as right now as possible.