California Church Bus Crash Highlights Need For Seat Belts On All Buses

California Church Bus Crash Highlights Need For Seat Belts On All Buses

A fatal church bus crash that recently occurred on a eminence road near Lake Gregory in California highlights for many parents, safety advocates, and injury lawyers the need for seat belts on all buses. Last February, a bus carrying 21 boylike members of a Pasadena church assemblage collided with an SUV, the impact sending it 25 feet down a snowy fortification and into a 50 - foot cedar, crushing its cab. The driver of the bus was killed and all of the passengers were injured, some critically. None of them had been wearing seat belts. The bus was not quizzed with them, according to the California Highway Guard.
While the governmental limitation does not require school buses weighing over 10, 000 pounds to be outfitted with seat belts, California does, however, only on newer models: all school buses manufactured on and after July 1, 2005 capable of carrying more that 16 passengers, as well as all school buses manufactured on and after July 1, 2004, according to the Department of Motor Vehicles. Buses weighing less than 10, 000 pounds fall under civic regulations and are required to have seat belts.
Such laws, unfortunately, do not invoice for older, vast buses like the one used by the church aggregation. Although the media has only indicated that the bus lacked seat belts, photographs of the accident suggest that it was manufactured long before 2004. Not retrofitting vehicles—or requiring them to be retrofitted—has been one area where vehicle lessee legislation has failed. Last summer, a child died after being ejected from her father’s 1956 Volkswagen Protrude during a collision. The Protrude, much like the church bus, was exempt from seat belt laws.
Why haven’t public seat belt regulations been adopted for all school buses, elderly and new? The State Highway Transportation Safety Administration claims that “school buses are one of the safest forms of transportation in the United States, ” citing their design as the threshold of their safety during crashes. The Administration asserts that thanks to they are substantial they control crash forces differently than passenger cars, causing bus occupants to experience less of the impact from an accident than other vehicle occupants.
The Administration also claims that the inhabitant refuge provided by a safety way called “compartmentalization” negates the need for seat belts on school buses. A key factor of compartmentalization is equipping buses with “strong, closely - spaced seats that have plan - winning seat backs. ”
" School buses may be safer than other vehicles, but accidents involving them still claim a weighty number of lives. In 2009, NHTSA reported that 118 people were killed and 13, 000 injured in school bus related crashes in 2009 ", according to Jim Ballidis a California injury lawyer. While California is one of the few states to mandate seat belts for school buses, the tragic accident that left 21 blooming people injured in the mountains near Lake Gregory serves as an darner that double legislation should be extended to older buses. Considering that seat belts reduce the risk of suffering fatal injuries during a crash by approximately 45 %, all vehicles should be efficient with them.